Google+

Castlevania: Harmony of Despair review

Solid
Shares
AT A GLANCE
  • Typically strong animation and music
  • Multiplayer really opens up the experience
  • Series fans will love seeing the cast together
  • Single-player way too grindy
  • Menus are confusing, often unhelpful
  • Kinda short if all six players are kicking ass

Reviewing Harmony of Despair has been quite a challenging experience. As fans of the 2D Castlevania games, the idea of a gorgeously high-def sequel packed with the coolest heroes and villains from the past several games sounded like a dream come true. But when it was revealed to be a six-player grindfest that tasks you with entering the same levels over and over again in a near-futile attempt to beat a boss a billion times stronger than you, the interest level understandably dipped.

But after several hours spent in co-op play, it’s fair to say that Despair is actually quite enjoyable in groups, and a concept that once seemed so contrary to the essence of Castlevania turns out to be a welcome shake-up of a series that’s been treading water for years.


Above: Four classic Castlevania heroes tackling two nasty enemies

As we hinted at earlier, the game is built around six massive maps that you (and ideally one or more friends) enter with only basic equipment. The goal is to navigate the immense area until you find and defeat the boss, who’s likely so powerful he’ll annihilate your party on the first outing. But, everything you collect during the trip, from money to be spent in the store to weapons and armor found in treasure chests, is retained for the next attempt. Thus begins the grind – repeatedly re-entering the same levels to gain money for better equipment, more random treasure chests and to see what relatively valuable item drop the boss may have.

There’s another wrinkle – each of the game’s playable characters has specific skills that are bolstered with repeated use, so the more you stick with one character and weapon layout, the stronger you’ll become over time. Longtime Castlevania fans will recognize the heroes and their powers: Soma Cruz steals monsters’ souls and uses them in battle (Dawn of Sorrow); Alucard gains various offensive and defensive spells (Symphony of the Night); Shanoa absorbs glyph magic from certain enemies and can cling to metal objects (Order of Ecclesia); Jonathon has the Vampire Killer whip and can power up the classic Castlevania weapons, such as dagger, cross and axe (Portrait of Ruin); And Charlotte, much like Shanoa, absorbs magic from particular enemies with her spell book (also Portrait of Ruin).

The only downside is the way in which you track each fighter’s progress – the menus aren’t overly helpful, and the game does very little to teach you how to read its various stats and progress meters.


Above: The zoomed-out view lets you see the whole map, plus every enemy, treasure chest and even the boss

The good news is that all the loot you gather is shared among everyone on the map. So if Shanoa opens a chest six floors up, she gets something suited for her while Alucard receives some type of goody as well. Soma Cruz is especially aided by this, as his power grows with each new soul collected, and enemies killed by your friends count towards that total. After a few trips through, you’ll all be sufficiently powered-up, able to tackle the boss and move on to the next map – and likely get your ass handed to you all over again.

Furthermore, playing in groups gives you faster and better access to the full map. Certain levers open doors or douse obtrusive flames that are several rooms away, which leads to a lot of backtracking. With two or three people in tow, one can flip the switch, another can wait by the door and move through, and the third can focus on gathering Water of Life, a special pickup that lets you revive a fallen friend. Players four and five can start clearing the boss area of additional enemies or go scouring for chests. So, with friends, you’re able to access more of the map, gain levels faster and accumulate money at an accelerated rate, plus orchestrate plans to tackle the crushingly tough bosses in record time. Without a doubt, that’s the way the play, but there are still issues that bring it all down.

The glaringly obvious fault of Despair is its single-player experience. Going alone, as previously mentioned, is a slog in the worst kind of way. With no friends to help beat back the monsters, discover alternate paths or collect additional loot, it quickly descends into mind-numbing madness. Oh it’s playable, but it’s about as fun as running through Monster Hunter all by yourself. There’s also the fact that each time you die you have to go through the whole level all over again (no saving progress, no pausing the game), which is expected from a grindy game, but much easier to deal with in groups.


Above: This boss is a huge, huge asshole, demanding multiple fights

Despair also imposes an artificial 30-minute time limit for each trip into a map. Not sure what the purpose of this, as we never once ran up against the clock, but because of this time limit you can’t pause or even look at the Xbox guide menu without the game continuing to run. It’s even more annoying when you’re trying to equip new items mid-mission (only at designated stations, not any time you like by the way), you’re five menus deep and suddenly hear your character being assaulted by enemies that walked right up to you. Doesn’t help that the menus themselves are a confusing mess – “Main Menu” actually takes you the character equip screen, not the game’s Main Menu. Um, clarification next time would be nice.


Above: The mid-view zooms out just enough to see the surrounding rooms

Finally, hitting the Back button brings up a series of pre-set voice prompts, which you can select and yell out to your group. But in the age of headsets and Xbox Live Party, why do we need “Oops!” and “Thank You” commands? This isn’t a 1997 LAN party, it’s 2010 with voice chat. Why is this even a feature?

Some of these complaints are trivial – the voice prompts, for example, don’t actually hurt anything, they’re just weird. But the focus on online multiplayer to the point of outright gutting the solo experience (or even split-screen play) makes this tough to recommend for anyone who doesn’t have two to three Castlevania-starved friends on Xbox Live. On the flip side, if you loved the DS entries, and have some pals who share your passion for Koji Igarashi’s take on the series, there’s still a whole lot of fun to be had.

Would we have preferred a new 2D, HD Castlevania that employed stunning new sprites instead of recycled heroes, villains and environments from the past 13 years? Hell yes. Does that make this game inherently bad for not being what we hoped? Definitely not. Just be aware of what you’re getting yourself into.

More Info

Available Platforms: Xbox 360, PS3

We Recommend

13 comments

  • Spybreak8 - August 5, 2010 4:33 a.m.

    Yeah It looks like it's not a game for me. I picked up Symphony of the Night awhile back when it was on sale. I played Super Metroid too and hmm I liked Metroid better. I'm just stuck fighting my mirror image lol. Haha my ReCaptcha has grinding in it, too funny.
  • garnsr - August 4, 2010 10:17 p.m.

    It just occurred to me that maybe they're waiting to add a Belmont to the PS3 version, and it'll be Veronica! That'd make everything better. And why the Hell does my ReCaptcha have a word in Greek? How am I supposed to type that in? Does it translate if I put the right English word in?
  • Romination - August 3, 2010 7:52 p.m.

    this sounds pretty terrible. Just go download Symphony of the Night cuz Alucard is a badass.
  • ViolentLee - August 3, 2010 7:42 p.m.

    Another beloved series ruined by developers' insistence on a multiplayer focus? AWESOME!!!111 ::fights back tears::
  • GamesRadarBrettElston - August 2, 2010 11:16 p.m.

    @listenermarine Most of my time was with just two players, and it was immensely better than playing alone. Three or four is best, but if you can convince the other person to stick with it, I bet you have a good time.
  • listerinemarine - August 2, 2010 10:40 p.m.

    Only one of my friends is even partially interested in this game, so does that mean I shouldn't get it?
  • Cyberninja - August 2, 2010 9:53 p.m.

    so whats the story anyway brett?
  • GamesRadarBrettElston - August 2, 2010 9:43 p.m.

    There's no Belmont in there yet, but it does seem strange to have a six player game with only five playable characters. Methinks more could be on the way. PS I wrote this.
  • garnsr - August 2, 2010 9:35 p.m.

    Why is not having a Belmont to play not one of the things I'll hate?
  • Chickenfoot - August 2, 2010 9:29 p.m.

    Castlevania: Oxymoron of the Night ReCaptcha: Playground oopses
  • Phazon117 - August 2, 2010 8:24 p.m.

    On the fence, thanks, GR, now I can make a clearer decision.
  • juicenpancakes - August 2, 2010 7:59 p.m.

    I was kind of on the fence about this game, I'm always skeptical about any new Castlevania. But I think I'll be getting it, I love Castlevania too much not to. Good review.
  • CaptainSpatula - August 2, 2010 7:56 p.m.

    been a castlevania fan since I was born. Came out holding a copy of Super Castlevania IV. I've played all the recent 2D revivals and loved them. I have a feeling this one is going to be awesome as well. Thanks for the review GR!

Showing 1-13 of 13 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.